Australian Open 2017

[DUN I LOVE]

Przynajmniej się dowiedziałem, dlaczego tak kibicujesz Joao Souzie.

[Hankmoody]

Kei najlepszy w meczu z Rychem, ale najczęściej Stan w roli głównej.

[Rroggerr]

Już kiedyś pisałem, że Wawrinka robi za Jamesa Hardena ATP. Kto ogląda NBA ten wie.

[Mario]

Leci piąty set finału w ES. Oczywiście spojrzę.

[DUN I LOVE]

3 razy dziś oglądałem, ale od stanu 2-3*.

[simon]

Dwóch koksiarzy wygrało debla z 8-zespołowej drabinki i jeszcze domagają się ukłonów?

Ukłony to powinniście kierować w stronę głupka Raonica, który nie potrafił zamknąć seta z 3-1, dzięki czemu wygrałem tylko w grze podwójnej.

Odpadłem w identyczny sposób. A taki byłem z siebie zadowolony po idealnie trafionym Goffinie.

Dwóch koksiarzy wygrało debla z 8-zespołowej drabinki i jeszcze domagają się ukłonów?

Znaczenie koksu w rozgrywkach deblowych ma mniej niż marginalne znaczenie.

Nie widziałem półfinału, ale z tego co usłyszałem w wywiadzie z Courierem to rzekoma kontuzja Rogera była blisko miejsca, które nie pozwoliło na medical na korcie.

Po meczu zmienił wersję i oznajmił, że więcej było w tym taktyki. Del Fed o tym wspominał, było na MTF-ie. Już nie drążę, bo jak wspomniałem, przesadnie mnie to nie uwiera. W każdym razie czuję się usatysfakcjonowany i doceniam szczerość.

[Barty]

[Barty]

Dzięki. Tu mam kompilację Twoich zagrań z ubiegłego sezonu.

Trudno mi się śmiać z nich, bo sam mam tendencję do psucia najprostszych wykładek. Ale przy Kei-u, szczególnie jego drugiej próbie leżę ze śmiechu.

[Damian]

That was Australian Open 2017

Spoiler:

The victors have left, the vanquished have gone. Melbourne Park is empty save for a bevy of workmen de-rigging the site.

For two weeks the Australian Open 2017 seemed like the centre of the universe but now it is over. And as the dust settles on a remarkable two weeks of sporting brilliance, shocks and surprises, there is a mild sense of disbelief in the air. After all that drama, the two champions are the two undisputed legends of their sport: Roger Federer and Serena Williams. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose – roughly translated: the more things change, the more they stay the same.

To say that Open was open this year is to take understatement to the very limit. The seeds tumbled out of the competition like oranges from a ripped shopping bag and from the very first day, holes appeared in the draws, gaps through which anyone with talent and courage could progress. Maybe this year was finally the moment we would see a changing of the guard. But no.

In the women’s field, Angelique Kerber was trying to reinforce her position as the defending champion and world No.1. She had struck a blow for the next generation by beating Serena here last year and backed it up by reaching the Wimbledon final and winning the US Open. Could she keep Serena at bay for another season? No; she never got a chance.

The fight to get to the top is cut-throat but staying there is a pressurised, relentless task. And Angie could not do it. Seemingly lacking that self-belief, the inner confidence which had carried her to such success last year, she was edgy in the first round, pushed hard in the second and finally bundled out in the fourth round by CoCo Vandeweghe. Serena, meanwhile, made stately progress.

For the best part of two decades, Serena has been the indomitable force of women’s tennis. The only woman to offer any real challenge to her superiority has been her sister Venus – no woman has beaten her more times – but at the age of 36, Venus’s resurgence seemed unlikely.

Struggling with Sjorgen’s syndrome, a debilitating autoimmune disease, Venus never knows from one day to the next how she will feel. Yet for two weeks in the Australian sunshine, she felt good. Very good. She fought as she had in her prime, she found power that harked back to her pomp and she forced her way to the final. At her age, this might have been her last hurrah but she intended that hurrah to be heard around the globe.

And Serena beat her.

The 6-4, 6-4 triumph earned her a 23rd grand slam trophy but we have been talking about that number for so long that it has almost lost its meaning. Two years ago, it was all about 18: could Serena match Chris Evert and Martina Navratilova for major titles. Back then, matching Steffi Graf’s tally of 22 seemed like a far distant target and yet here we are, 24 months later, and Serena is the unmatched queen of the Open Era: 23 titles and counting; 19 years of supremacy. Only Margaret Court has more with 24 – and that record may not last the year.

At the age of 35, Serena had swept all before her. She removed Johanna Konta – the form player coming into the tournament – in the quarterfinals and stood and watched as the likes of Garbine Muguruza, the French Open champion, Karolina Pliskova (the US open runner-up) and Kerber fell by the wayside. Once into the final, she was happy her sister had made the journey but she would not let her come close to the trophy.

In the men’s draw, the shockwaves shuddered through the locker room from the second round. Novak Djokovic, the six-time champion, was downed at the second hurdle by Denis Istomin, a wild card from Uzbekistan. A few days later, Andy Murray, the world No.1, was sent packing by Mischa Zverev, a 29-year-old German who had all but given up on his career due to injury a handful of years ago.

Huge gaps had appeared in the top and bottom half of the men’s draw – this was the chance for the younger men, those eternally optimistic souls who had butted heads with the established stars, to make their mark. But they couldn’t do it. They tried and some came close, but Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal would not let them pass.

The tales of Federer and Nadal’s comebacks from injury has been well documented elsewhere on this website so suffice to say that neither man had come to Melbourne with the serious intent of winning the title. Nadal had more cause to be hopeful – he had had less time off and he felt physically stronger than his old rival – but even so, he was trying to win a grand slam from a standing start.

But as the rounds went by and the final came into sharper focus, both men reverted to type. It was the last match of a major championship; this is what they do, this is what they know, this is what they are here for. By the end of Sunday night, they would have 32 grand slam titles between them – they just needed to sort out who went home the cup this time.

It was the final that everyone had dreamed of but that no one though could happen. And as it unfolded, it was all that anyone could have hoped for: Federer attacking on the front foot, Nadal pummelling and punishing from the baseline. And for once, Federer managed to turn back the clock and rediscover the free-flowing, aggressive game of his prime. He said he needed to free his mind and play free – and he did. When Nadal looked to have him on the ropes, he found the knock-out punch – and so often it was the backhand that did it – and after five sets and three and a half hours, he had his prize: his fifth Australian Open crown and his 18th grand slam title.

The changing of the guard has been postponed; the establishment refuses to be moved.

Nadal took his defeat well, but you could tell that it hurt. But there was a glint in his eye as he looked towards the French Open. He has not won a grand slam title since Roland Garros 2014 but he knows now that he is ready to end that drought.

The Australian Open 2017 had been a fairy tale story for both champions but it was only the opening chapter of what could become a classic season.

http://www.ausopen.com/en_AU/news/artic ... _2017.html

[DUN I LOVE]

Zapomniałem się przywitać. To już drugi poranek w nowej rzeczywistości.

[Joao]

Zapomniałem się przywitać. To już drugi poranek w nowej rzeczywistości.

Jeszcze ci nie przeszło

[DUN I LOVE]

The Djoker, mój doradca, zasugerował, żeby celebrować jak najdłużej, bo kolejna okazja może się już nie powtórzyć.

[Joao]

Dawidzie, jak tam statystki, bo pisałeś, że wczoraj wieczorem opublikujesz.

[DUN I LOVE]

Nie wyrobiłem się, więc pewnie najwcześniej jutro (dziś wtorek, tj. dzień treningowy).

[Joao]

Jakbyś nie miał czasu jutro, to napisz. Mogę we środę co nieco zrobić

[DUN I LOVE]

Dam radę, ale dzięki.

Na ile, waszym zdaniem, kombinacje z nawierzchnią i piłkami wpłynęły na przebieg tego turnieju?

[Damian]

Na ile, waszym zdaniem, kombinacje z nawierzchnią i piłkami wpłynęły na przebieg tego turnieju?

Jakiś na pewno miały, niewykluczone, że semi i finał miałoby inny przebieg z nawierzchnią z poprzednich lat. Ale raczej dobra decyzja ze zmianą nawierzchni.

[Artras]

Na ile, waszym zdaniem, kombinacje z nawierzchnią i piłkami wpłynęły na przebieg tego turnieju?

Zapytam bo nie wiem. Orientuje się ktoś jak wygląda proces przyśpieszania nawierzchni ?

[DUN I LOVE]

Co masz dokładnie na myśli? Jak to się robi czy info o tym, że ATp próbuje globalnie zaimplementować tę tendencję?

[Lleyton]

Australian Open 2017 Awards

Spoiler:

Biggest upset, best fairytale, best celebration, best racquet smash and plenty more from this year's Open.
Most Popular
Match Report
Federer’s high five
Roger Federer celebrates winning Australian Open 2017
Video
Federer v Nadal: A miracle of modern sport
Federer v Nadal: A miracle of modern sport
Feature
AO Expert: It all came down to this
Roger Federer, F, Rod Laver Arena, 29 January 2017.
Gallery
Photographer's selects - Ben Solomon
Serena Williams, 29 January 2017.
Video
That was the men's draw
That was the men's draw
By David Packman | 29 January, 2017
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni, QF, Rod Laver Arena, 25 January 2017
Photo by: Getty Images

Biggest upset
Early on in the tournament, it looked like the seeds would be largely untroubled, with only three men and six women losing their opening rounds, almost half of the total upset at the first stage last year. But little did we know of what lay ahead.

Nobody could have predicted the early demise of both Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray in the first week of the tournament, but that’s exactly what transpired. The reigning Australian Open champion lost his second round encounter with Uzbek journeyman Denis Istomin in five pulsating sets while the freshly-crowned world No.1 went down to renaissance man Mischa Zverev in four.

We’re also not discounting surprise semifinalist CoCo Vandeweghe upsetting women’s No.1 AND reigning champion Angelique Kerber. The American’s impressive run also included a win over No.7 seed Garbine Muguruza – in fact, she only lost a total of nine games in mowing them both down.

However, considering the evidence presented, we are going to hand it to Denis. The 30-year-old was first out of the gate among the big-name upsets, he was the lowest ranked, and he defeated a man with an impeccable Grand Slam record.

Best fairytale
Where to even begin? There was so much to love at this year’s Australian Open. From the return of Venus and a Williams sisters final, to the dream of Roger and Rafa. It’s all really been ‘pinch yourself’ stuff from woe to go. But one player stands out, and that’s Mirjana Lucic-Baroni.

Her story of redemption is nothing short of incredible, as she bookended her wins in Melbourne with a 19-year gap. The 34-year-old Croatian then won our hearts as she rose on a tide of momentum to reach her first major semifinal. “One day I will say a long, big story about things that have happened to me,” she said. “But I could never have dreamt I would be here again.”

Special mention to Mischa Zverev. The German made a legion of friends with his old school skills on the court and disarming sincerity off it. Coming from relative obscurity and the verge of retirement to topple the world No.1 in Melbourne? A big thumbs-up from us.

Best performed siblings
We can’t go past Venus and Serena, but while we’re on the topic of Mischa, let’s not forget younger brother and fast-rising star Sascha, who very nearly ousted Nadal in a third round five-set marathon at Rod Laver Arena. Meanwhile, Karolina Pliskova came in as a firm favourite for the title but only made it as far as the quarterfinals, while twin sister Kristyna equaled her best ever result at a major, making the third round.

Best on-court speech
It’s probably the first time that a single player has been recognised twice in the AO Awards, but Mirjana Lucic-Baroni gets the nod again. After first suggesting her thoughts might be a little too risqué for television, she was pressed, so she just went for it. “F... everything and everybody, whoever tells you that you can’t do it. Just show up and do it with your heart.” FTW.

Best celebration
We have no hesitation in handing it to Venus Williams and that dance.

Best racquet smash
There’s two clear contenders here – and both have a keen sense of occasion. For pure intent however, Stan gets the nod, with his nonchalant ‘snap-across-the-knee’ against Roger Federer in their semifinal. No mess. No fuss. The other? Serena’s little racquet slap in the final resulted in a clean break, right across the throat. Yikes.

Best performing local
We can’t split Dylan Alcott and John Peers here. The dual Rio gold medalist won his third Australian Open title in a row in the quad wheelchair event while Peers claimed his maiden Grand Slam title, beating the Bryan brothers in the men’s doubles final. First class both.

Shot of the tournament
Not Monfils. Not Kyrgios. Not even Aga's tweener, but this.

Best(?) dressed
Pat. Please. It’s time. Someone, buy the man a tie. Refer to picture at top of the page

Best tweet
For sheer weight of numbers, we may have to pat ourselves on the shoulder ourselves here. Five million impressions and counting. Clearly, we humbly accept our own award on behalf of Roger and Rafa.

When all is said it done, we’ll just give one last award to the universe, or collective consciousness, or maybe to all us; the fans, the players, everyone. We’re just not sure it’s possible to single anyone out for delivering these two unbelievable finals. Or if we should even try. Thank you!

http://www.ausopen.com/en_AU/news/artic ... wards.html